The process of finding antiderivatives can feel a bit frightening as integrands become more complicated. Luckily there are certain techniques that can help us identify and adequately tackle more intricate indefinite integrals. In this topic, you'll take a look at the Integration by Parts technique. You'll also see how it can help you when integrands involve the product of two (or more) functions.
Integration by Parts
As its name suggests, this method consists of separating the original integrand into parts. Before elaborating further, let's recall the rule to find derivatives of products of two functions and
Rearranging terms
Integrating both sides of the equation
We know that and , so our expression becomes
which is the main formula for this method.
Here, represents the original integrand, including the differential. This integrand represents the product of two (or more) functions: is usually a function that becomes easier to integrate after differentiation. is the product of times a function whose antiderivative is known beforehand or can be determined without much effort.
If applied properly, the resulting integral should be at least easier to solve than the original one. It can even be immediately solved as in one of the cases you've seen previously.
For example, let's consider the following integral
First, let's define both and as follows:
Then, you need to find both and :
Now, you can substitute these expressions following the formula above, like so
You can see how your initial integral has become a simpler one. In fact, you know the resulting integral has a direct antiderivative:
Thus,
Integral of logarithmic functions
In order to find the antiderivative of a logarithmic function
you can use the integration by parts method. By rewriting your integrand, you can identify both and and their derivatives:
Substituting these expressions in your integration by parts formula, you obtain
And so,
You can generalize this to logarithms of any base using the change of base property of logarithms:
Then,
Algebra and integrals
Let's consider the following integral
Where is a placeholder for the result of the integral.
You can apply integration by parts in order to expand the expression, like so
Thus,
Now, you have a new integral to solve. Applying integration by parts again
Then,
But wait! What is in that last term on the right-hand side of your equation? Recall your original integral:
Substituting in, and solving for
[ALERT] Remember to add the constant of integration! [/ALERT]
Finally, you have
For some integrands, the cyclical relationship between their derivatives and antiderivatives appears when using the integration-by-parts method. As you saw in this example, which deals with an integrand comprised of sines and cosines, the re-appearing integrand can be grouped together with the original one to solve these integrals.
Tips for newcomers
The actual skill behind the Integration by Parts method lies in developing an intuition to correctly identify both and . This intuition is built with practice by solving integrals over and over, and there's no way around that. However, when it comes to new learners trying to solve their first integrals, there are a few useful tips to remember:
- Derivatives of logarithmic, inverse trigonometric, and polynomial functions all result in "simpler" expressions: While their antiderivatives are more intricate:Thus, these types of functions are good candidates for
- Neither differentiation nor integration of exponential and (non-inverse) trigonometric functions usually result in "simpler" integrals: If differentiating another factor in the original integrand simplifies the whole expression, it can be beneficial to integrate these. Thus, these types of functions are good candidates for
An example:
Let's consider the following integral:
Identifying both and is a pretty straightforward process using our tips:
Then, you are left with an easier integral to solve:
A counterexample:
It is good to remember that these tips are not rules, but guidelines to which there can be many exceptions. As a counter-example, let's consider the following integral:
If you were to choose and as follows
You would be left with an even more difficult integral to solve
If instead, you were to choose and in this other manner:
You would obtain a much easier integral to solve
In summary, a good rule of thumb is comparing the resulting integral to the original one; if the integrand became more difficult to integrate then it probably wasn't the right choice. Remember, there is no shame in going back and choosing again!
Conclusion
In this topic, you have learned about the integration by parts method. This integration method can be summarized as follows:
In addition, you've also learned the rule to determine the antiderivative for logarithmic functions:
You also learned that certain integrands can re-appear after applying the integration by parts method and that elementary algebra can help us solve these integrals.
Finally, you learned that even though certain functions can usually fit better as either or , there can be exceptions. Therefore, an intuition must be developed in order to make sure the resulting integral is easier to solve that the original one.