Table of contents
Text Link

Julia vs Python: A Comparison of Two Popular Programming Languages

When choosing a programming language, there are many options to consider. However, two languages have emerged as clear favorites among developers: Julia and Python. Both are powerful general-purpose languages and have an active community, but each has its own strengths and weaknesses. In this article, we'll compare Python and Julia on sentiment analysis, cloud computing, artificial intelligence, and more.

General Overview

Julia is a relatively new programming language introduced in 2012 by Stefan Karpinski. It was created for scientific and numerical computing (i.e. mathematical formulas), focusing on performance and ease of use. Julia's math-friendly syntax is similar to that of MATLAB and Python, but its speed and ability to compile to native code set it apart.

Python, on the other hand, is a popular language that Guido van Rossum created in the late 1980s. It's known for its simplicity and readability, making it a popular choice for beginners. Python's extensive external libraries of modules and packages have made it a go-to language for everything from web development to artificial intelligence.

Coding Differences

Let's look at the differences between Julia and Python with some code snippets from simple linear algebra. First, consider the following code to calculate the sum of a list of numbers:

# Python
def sum_list(lst):
    result = 0
    for num in lst:
        result += num
    return result

# Julia
function sum_list(lst)
    result = 0
    for num in lst
        result += num
    end
    return result
end 

As you can see, the syntax for the two languages is similar. However, Julia's  end instead of curly braces or indentation to mark the end of a block may take some time to get used to, especially when you work on large-scale linear algebra.

Next, let's compare the performance of the two languages with the following code to calculate the sum of the first 1,000,000 numbers:

# Python
total = 0
for i in range(1000000):
    total += i

# Julia
total = 0
for i = 1:1000000
    global total += i
end 

In this case, Julia's ability to compile native code in dynamic typing gives it a significant performance advantage over Python.  

Julia's Execution Speed Advantage

One of the key selling points of Julia is speed. This is particularly important for scientific and parallel computing, where large datasets and complex calculations can quickly become time-consuming. Let's look at an example:

# Julia
@time begin
    a = rand(1000, 1000)
    b = rand(1000)
    x = a \ b
end

# Python with NumPy
import numpy as np
from time import time

start = time()
a = np.random.rand(1000, 1000)
b = np.random.rand(1000)
x = np.linalg.solve(a, b)
end = time()

print(end - start) 

In this case, Julia code is the clear winner again, with its @time macro providing an easy way to measure execution time. And at this point, you can call Julia a dynamic, high-level, high-performance programming language. But let’s dive deeper.

Python Code is more Efficient

While Julia may have the edge in terms of performance, the largest developer communities prefer Python’s simplicity and ease of use, which are hard to beat. Take a look at the following code to calculate the Fibonacci sequence:

# Julia
function fibonacci(n)
    if n < 2
        return n
    else
        return fibonacci(n-1) + fibonacci(n-2)
    end
end

for i = 1:10
    println(fibonacci(i))
end

# Python
def fibonacci(n):
    if n < 2:
        return n
    else:
        return fibonacci(n-1) + fibonacci(n-2)

for i in range(1, 11):
    print(fibonacci(i)) 

In this example, we can see that Julia has a more complex syntax than Python. While Julia’s syntax is similar to that of traditional formulaic languages like C and Fortran, Python has a more intuitive and code-friendly syntax.

Python’s Range of Libraries is more Suitable for Machine Learning

Python has one of the most extensive collections of modules and packages, which makes it very popular for scientific computing, machine learning, and data analysis. It has third-party libraries like NumPy, Pandas, Scikit-learn, TensorFlow, Keras, and PyTorch, which make it easy to work with large datasets, build complex machine-learning models, and perform data analysis.

Here’s an example of how you can use the Pandas library in Python to work with data frames:

import pandas as pd

# Create a data frame
data = {
    'Name': ['John', 'Paul', 'George', 'Ringo'],
    'Age': [32, 28, 27, 25],
    'Country': ['USA', 'UK', 'UK', 'USA']
}

df = pd.DataFrame(data)

# Print the data frame
print(df) 

The output of this code would be:

#Python
Name Age Country
0 John 32 USA
1 Paul 28 UK
2 George 27 UK
3 Ringo 25 USA 

This example shows how easy it is to work with data frames using the Pandas library in Python. Python’s vast library of modules and packages is one of the main reasons it is so popular among the science community.

Conclusion

Both Julia and Python have their strengths and weaknesses. Julia is faster than Python at the time of writing, making it ideal for scientific and technical computing and other performance-intensive tasks. On the other hand, Python has a code-friendly syntax and a vast library of modules and packages, making it ideal for data analysis, machine learning, and other tasks that do not require high performance.

When picking a winner in Julia vs Python, it’s your preference. If you need to carry out performance-intensive tasks like statistical computing, then Julia may be the better developer choice. Python is the preferred choice if you need to perform a wider range of tasks due to its vast collection of modules and packages. In any case, both languages are great tools for any programmer to have in their arsenal.

If mastering Python is your goal, Hyperskill’s diverse educational tracks are here to guide you on a learning journey tailored to your needs, no matter your level of expertise.

Related Hyperskill topics

Share this article
Get more articles
like this
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong.

Create a free account to access the full topic

Wide range of learning tracks for beginners and experienced developers
Study at your own pace with your personal study plan
Focus on practice and real-world experience
Andrei Maftei
It has all the necessary theory, lots of practice, and projects of different levels. I haven't skipped any of the 3000+ coding exercises.